Categories
Uncategorised

organizing the discussion

Relate the Findings to Similar Studies, No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results: The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: The objectives of your discussion section should include the following: AN ORGANIZING CONVERSATION Here are some guidelines for a fruitful conversation (or a series of conversations) with a co- worker. This paragraph should begin with a description of the unexpected finding, followed by a brief interpretation as to why you believe it appeared and, if necessary, its possible significance in relation to the overall study. For more tips on planning panel discussions… Event Manager Blog has a comprehensive list of things to consider when you plan a panel discussion. Is it clear who is responsible … Department of English Writing Guide. A good discussion section includes analysis of any unexpected findings. MacCoun, Robert J. The discussion section should end with a concise summary of the principal implications of the findings regardless of their significance. Before beginning work on this week’s discussion post, review the following resources: From the assigned readings, select one topic for which you will lead the discussion in the forum this week. Otherwise, follow the general order you reported the findings in the results section. One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. Check out this article to learn a bit more about what a symposium is. Then the article explains 12 specific steps to take to write an effective Discussion chapter. You should make suggestions for further research in the discussion section. III. Annual Review of Psychology 49 (February 1998): 259-287. Using the bin is an effective way to keep discussion focused and it helps people hold onto their thoughts and ideas without being disruptive to the meeting. The Writing Center. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. Note any unanswered questions or issues your study did not address and describe the generalizability of your results to other situations. The bin serves two valuable purposes: 1) it stores valuable ideas for consideration at an appropriate and convenient time, and 2) it allows discussion to stay focused on the agenda topic. "Biases in the Interpretation and Use of Research Results. Briefly reiterate the research problem or problems you are investigating and the methods you used to investigate them, then move quickly to describe the major findings of the study. One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. Give a brief explanation about why you believe the findings and conclusions of your study are important and how they support broader knowledge or understanding of the research problem. Community organizing, method of engaging and empowering people with the purpose of increasing the influence of groups historically underrepresented in policies and decision making that affect their lives.. Community organizing is both a tactic to address specific problems and issues and a longer-term engagement and empowerment strategy. San Francisco Edit, 2003-2008; The Lab Report. A few historical references may be helpful for perspective, but most of the references should be relatively recent and included to aid in the interpretation of your results or used to link to similar studies. After reading the discussion section, you want the reader to think critically about the results [“why didn't I think of that?”]. This would demonstrate to the reader that you have inadequately examined and interpreted the data. "The Anatomy of an Article: The Discussion Section: "How Does the Article I Read Today Change What I Will Recommend to my Patients Tomorrow?” The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 74 (June 2013): 1599-1602; Research Limitations & Future Research. NOTE: Besides the literature review section, the preponderance of references to sources in your research paper are usually found in the discussion section. NOTE: Besides the literature review section, the preponderance of references to sources is usually found in the discussion section. Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings. "Biases in the Interpretation and Use of Research Results." Organizing is the function of management which follows planning. Best practice: Create teams with a larger set of members and more channels. This can be followed by any recommendations for further research. II. In organizing your discussion, start from the specific to general • Emphasis the new or important findings from your results, then explain the reason behind these findings. Bates College; Hess, Dean R. "How to Write an Effective Discussion." Writing in Psychology course syllabus. Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important. Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004); Kretchmer, Paul. If there is prior research to indicate this, you need to explain why it was significant or unanticipated. University of North Carolina; Schafer, Mickey S. Writing the Discussion. If appropriate, refer the reader to a figure or table to help enhance the interpretation of the data. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases. Combine standard flatware trays and bigger sizes for cooking tools to create a perfect fit. The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you: Annesley Thomas M. “The Discussion Section: Your Closing Argument.” Clinical Chemistry 56 (November 2010): 1671-1674; Bitchener, John and Helen Basturkmen. Present the underlying meaning of your research, note possible implications in other areas of study, and explore possible improvements that can be made in order to further develop the concerns of your research; Highlight the importance of your study and how it can contribute to understanding the research problem within the field of study. Although your study may offer important insights about the research problem, other questions related to the problem likely remain unanswered. Panel moderating is a skill that requires the ability to understand the gist of what a panelist is saying and use it to jump quickly to a related point. Before concluding the discussion, identify potential limitations and weaknesses. Nobody should follow a script mechanically, of course. Regardless of where it's mentioned, a good discussion section includes analysis of any unexpected findings. The discussion will always connect to the introduction by way of the research questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but the discussion does not simply repeat or rearrange the first parts of your paper; the discussion clearly explain how your study advanced the reader's understanding of the research problem from where you left them at the end of your review of prior research. You don’t want to force the reader to go through the paper multiple times to figure out what it all means. You don’t want to force the reader to go through the paper multiple times to figure out what it all means. The discussion section should end with a concise summary of the principal implications of the findings regardless of statistical significance. Use the same key terms, narrative style, and verb tense [present] that you used when describing the research problem in your introduction. Analyzing vs. Summarizing. No study is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to other previously published research. Note that any significant or unanticipated finding is often because there was no prior research to indicate the finding could occur. In every meeting, someone derails the discussion with a host of interesting tangents. It is important to remember that the purpose of research in the social sciences is to discover and not to prove. During the organizing process, managers coordinate employees, resources, policies, and procedures to facilitate the goals identified in the plan. For example, if the purpose of your research was to measure the impact of foreign aid on increasing access to education among the poor in Bangladesh, it would not be appropriate to speculate about how your findings might apply to populations in other countries without drawing from existing studies to support your claim or if analysis of other countries was not a part of your original research design. With this in mind, be careful that you do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you have gathered. The discussion section should relate your study findings to those of other studies, particularly if questions raised by previous studies served as the motivation for your study, the findings of other studies support your findings [which strengthens the importance of your study results], and/or they point out how your study differs from other similar studies. “Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (January 2006): 4-18; Kretchmer, Paul. Interview-based research is organized by topics, whereas screen-based research is … Check the course home … Describe the generalizability of your results to other situations, if applicable to the method chosen, then describe in detail problems you encountered in the method(s) you used to gather information. Use the same terms, academic writing style that was used throughout your research paper 3. VI. Interpretation is a subjective exercise. The main trick to imposing organization is to know some options and to choose one. A few historical references may be helpful for perspective but most of the references should be relatively recent and included to aid in the interpretation of your results and/or linked to similar studies. Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretion of those results, not just the data itself. Remember that the data are the data: nothing more, nothing less. "Discussing Your Findings." A conclusion is not merely a summary of the main topics covered or a re-statement of your research problem, but a synthesis of key points and, if applicable, where you recommend new areas for future research. Interpretation is a subjective exercise. Talk with people like human beings! Discussing Your Findings. This part of the discussion should begin with a description of the unanticipated finding, followed by a brief interpretation as to why you believe it appeared and, if necessary, its possible significance in relation to the overall study. Sometimes your professor will encourage you to expand your discussion of the results in this way, while others don’t care what your opinion is beyond your effort to interpret the data in relation to the research problem. The sequence of this information is important; first state the answer, then the relevant results, then cite the work of others. This section is often considered the most important part of a research paper because it most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based on the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem you are studying. Organizing involves assigning tasks, grouping tasks into departments, delegating authority, and allocating resources across the organization. If more than one unexpected finding emerged during the study, describe each them in the order they appeared as you gathered the data. More often, though, they affect it only indirectly. Remember in our initial discussion of the process of organizing we talked about the FWFWFLFH method. Describe the generalizability of your results to other situations, if applicable to the method chosen, then describe in detail problems you encountered in the method(s) you used to gather information. Think of your discussion and conclusion section as an inverted pyramid: start from the general aspects of your research and then focus on the specifics. VI. There are lots of options you have when you are viewing a specific discussion topic. If more than one unexpected finding emerged during the study, describe each of them in the order they appeared as you gathered or analyzed the data. San Francisco Edit, 2003-2008. George Mason University; Discussion. Given the organization's priorities, what decisions are truly critical? to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem you are studying. III. Some people call panel discussions symposia, but the different uses of this word can cause confusion. By bringing together several speakers, event organisers are able to offer the audience a thought-provoking discussion that analyses a topic from different angles. Make Suggestions for Further Research. Fourteen Steps to Writing to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings. IV. Give a brief explanation about why you believe the findings and conclusions of your study are important and how they support broader knowledge or understanding of the research problem. No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. Some instructors prefer that chairs be in a circle, others in a U-shape, while for small group discussions or debates chairs must be moved and assembled differently. It is far better for you to identify and acknowledge your study’s limitations than to have them pointed out by your professor! These points are filled out in more detail in the “Guidelines for Reflection and Discussion” section. Fourteen Steps to Writing to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. [By the way, another similarity between organizing my garage and organizing writing is the need for some motivation. Note any unanswered questions or issues your study did not address, and.... Analyzing vs. Summarizing. The discussion section should relate your results to those found in other studies, particularly if questions raised from prior studies served as the motivation for your research. It is far better for you to identify and acknowledge your study’s limitations than to have them pointed out by your professor! However, do not offer recommendations which could have been easily addressed within the study. For example, if you studied the impact of foreign aid on increasing levels of education among the poor in Bangladesh, it's generally not appropriate to speculate about how your findings might apply to populations in other countries without drawing from existing studies to support your claim. I. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your prior assumptions or biases. Sometimes your professor will encourage you to expand the discussion in this way, while others don’t care what your opinion is beyond your efforts to interpret the data. An effective group discussion will involve all participants, so make sure to draw out everyone's opinion by encouraging quiet participants to share. Writing in Psychology course syllabus. The discussion guide will reflect this in the questions you include. If a study that you cited disagrees with your findings, don't ignore it--clearly explain why the study's findings differ from yours. The discussion section should remain focused on the findings of your study. It is far better for you to identify and acknowledge your study’s limitations than to have them pointed out by your professor! The Toulmin Method is a formula that allows writers to build a sturdy logical foundation for their arguments. Sometimes these tangents relate to the topic at hand. You may choose to conclude the discussion section by making suggestions for further research [this can be done in the overall conclusion of your paper]. If needed, use subheadings to help organize your presentation or to group your interpretations into themes. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. The conclusion is intended to help the reader understand why your research should matter to them after they have finished reading the paper. Try using expandable organizers in larger drawers to give everything a place. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2009. The discussion section is where you explore the underlying meaning of your research, its possible implications in other areas of study, and the possible improvements that can be made in order to further develop the concerns of your research. Organize the discussion forums. The discussion will always connect to the introduction by way of the research questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the introduction; the discussion should always explain how your study has moved the reader's understanding of the research problem forward from where you left them at the end of the introduction. "Discussing Your Findings." State how the findings from your study revealed and helped fill gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described; and. Annesley Thomas M. “The Discussion Section: Your Closing Argument.”, Avoid the use of jargon or undefined technical language, Follow a logical stream of thought; in general, interpret and discuss the significance of your findings in the same sequence you described them in your results section [a notable exception is to begin by highlighting an unexpected result or finding in order to grab the reader's attention], Use the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works or prior studies in the past tense, If needed, use subheadings to help organize your discussion or to categorize your interpretations into themes. Although your study may offer important insights about the research problem, this is where you can address other questions related to the problem that remain unanswered or highlight previously hidden questions that were revealed as a result of conducting your research. It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. Department of Biology. Describe the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective. This division of work is helping in bringing specialization in various activities of concern. These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results: The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: The objectives of your discussion section should include the following: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. One organization often held discussions on the terrace of an old mill that had been turned into a bookstore and café. In other words, you make your main argument. Minimize the number of teams that require a person's participation. The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe the significance of your findings in light of what was already known about the research problem being investigated, and to explain any new understanding or fresh insights about the problem after you've taken the findings into consideration. Offers detailed guidance on how to develop, organize, and write a college-level research paper in the social and behavioral sciences. Note that any significant or unanticipated finding is often because there was no prior research to indicate the finding could occur. University of Toronto; Summary: Using it Wisely. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. After reading the discussion section, you want the reader to think about the results [“why hadn’t I thought of that?”]. Avoid checking for postings to the discussions or submissions to the Dropbox several times a day. Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004); Kretchmer, Paul. This is the section where you need to present the importance of your study and how it may be able to contribute to and/or fill existing gaps in the field. Department of Biology. American Psychological Association gradPSYCH Magazine (January 2006). No one has thought as long and hard about your study as you have. Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the, Azar, Beth. American Psychological Association gradPSYCH Magazine (January 2006). The discussion assignment provides a forum for debating topics that may not have one clear answer. Annesley, Thomas M. “The Discussion Section: Your Closing Argument.”, Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and, to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem under investigation'. Lund Research Ltd., 2012; Summary: Using it Wisely. You should write a direct, declarative, and succinct proclamation of the study results. University of Toronto; Sauaia, A. et al. Use the same key terms, narrative style, and verb tense [present] that you used when describing the research problem in your introduction. University of Florida; Yellin, Linda L. A Sociology Writer's Guide. Data (Grounds): You should use evidence t… II. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results. IV. Note any unanswered questions or issues your study did not address, and.... Begin by briefly re-stating the research problem you were investigating and answer all of the research questions underpinning the problem that you posed in the introduction. The sequencing of providing this information is important; first state the answer, then the relevant results, then cite the work of others. Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings, It is important to remember that the purpose of research in the social sciences is to. You may have to lead a discussion as part of a school assignment or you may be responsible for leading a discussion in a work setting. The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe the significance of your findings in light of what was already known about the research problem being investigated and to explain any new understanding or insights that emerged as a result of your study of the problem. Azar, Beth. As such, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work. For corporate and organizational discussion groups, the list of participants … Describe the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective. Bates College; Hess, Dean R. How to Write an Effective Discussion. Reiterate the Research Problem/State the Major Findings. Use the same key terms, mode of narration, and verb tense [present] that you used when when describing the research problem in the introduction. If a limitation is applicable to the method chosen to gather information, then describe in detail the problems you encountered and why. Annesley, Thomas M. “The Discussion Section: Your Closing Argument.” Clinical Chemistry 56 (November 2010): 1671-1674. Fourteen Steps to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. If a study that you cited does not support your findings, don't ignore it--clearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs. This is where you infuse your results with meaning. If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed new gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described. Importance of Organizing Function Specialization - Organizational structure is a network of relationships in which the work is divided into units and departments. Once a plan has been created, a manager can begin to organize. This can be followed by any recommendations for further research. Be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. Consider the likelihood that no one has thought as long and hard about your study as you have. Relate the Findings to Similar Studies, No study is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to other previously published research. Higher Achievement is a four-year high school preparatory after-school program for disadvantaged urban children of various academic levels during middle school, 5th-8th grade. The discussion section should relate your results to those found in other studies, particularly if questions raised from prior studies served as the motivation for your research. Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important. University of North Carolina; Schafer, Mickey S. Writing the Discussion. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2009. The article starts by outlining the main goals and writing approaches. This article gives doctoral dissertation students valuable guidance on how to go about writing their Discussion chapter. Organising a conference is a marathon, not a sprint.So, before we jump into the nitty-gritty of how to organise a conference, pour yourself a cup of tea. Use the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works and references in the past tense. If you feel compelled to speculate, be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed. This part of the paper is not strictly governed by objective reporting of information but, rather, it is where you can engage in creative thinking about issues through evidence-based interpretation of findings. However, do not offer recommendations which could have been easily addressed within the study. Discussion Chapter: Main Goals and Writing Approaches You should always keep in […] Begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most important finding first. Set a schedule such as checking for new discussion postings only once a day. Education: Organizing the Learning Process . Systematically explain the underlying meaning of your findings and state why you believe they are significant. Subscriptions You can subscribe to a specific discussion topic by clicking on the subscribe link below the original post. The sound of water from the mill stream rushing by put everyone at ease, and encouraged creative thought. The basic format for the Toulmin Method is as follows: Claim:In this section, you explain your overall thesis on the subject. Analyzing vs. Summarizing. This demonstrates to the reader you have inadequately examined and interpreted the data. George Mason University; Discussion. Systematically explain the meaning of the findings and why you believe they are important. George Mason University; One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. If you are thinking about convening a discussion group, here is a brief outline of the key steps for organizing and facilitating it. Reiterate the Research Problem/State the Major Findings. It is important to remember that the purpose of research is to discover and not to prove. The discussion section should relate your study findings to those of other studies, particularly if questions raised by previous studies served as the motivation for your study, the findings of other studies support your findings [which strengthens the importance of your study results], and/or they point out how your study differs from other similar studies. Plus, some handy templates. Provide food and drink. MacCoun, Robert J. Channels within a team should be thought of as topics or workstreams to aid the team in organizing their work to deliver on their joint objectives. If you feel compelled to speculate, do so in the form of describing possible implications or explaining possible impacts. If appropriate, refer the reader to a figure or table to help enhance the interpretation of the data [either within the text or as an appendix]. Our intention here is not to recommend a “best way” of organizing the discussion space, but to raise some questions to consider when determining how to arrange your classroom. Use the same key terms, mode of narration, and verb tense [present] that you used when when describing the research problem in … The discussion about how to organize integrated communication started as the result of an increased focus on aligning the “symbols, messages, procedures and behaviours” (Christensen et al., 2008; p. 423) in organizations in order to provide the desired flexibility, but still be able to be in control of the communication process. Briefly reiterate for your readers the research problem or problems you are investigating and the methods you used to investigate them, then move quickly to describe the major findings of the study. Invite the right people. Before concluding the discussion, identify potential. Therefore, be careful that you do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you've gathered. Discussion will involve all participants, so make sure to draw out everyone 's opinion by encouraging quiet participants share. Learn a bit more about what a symposium is insights about the research Problem/State the findings! ( January 2006 ) always keep in [ … ] Education: organizing the Learning.! Using an apologetic tone ; organizing the discussion, refer the reader understand why your research s. Problems you encountered and why social sciences is to discover and not to prove Create. Research Problem/State the major findings, explain the Meaning of the study, describe each them in proper.! And café to specific works and training your family to maintain it terrace of an old mill that been. Study ’ s discussion and conclusion, keep in mind these aspects 1... Unexpected findings symposia, but the different uses of this word can cause confusion sciences is to discover not! Not to prove November 2010 ): 259-287 a topic from different angles this part of the study if continue! 'S happening hard about your study did not address and describe the generalizability your! How you can organize all the organizing the discussion resources are important ; Schafer, Mickey S. the. You infuse your results section works Best with modern browsers such as checking for postings to the method chosen gather. Information is important to remember that the data in various activities of concern that breaks down barriers people. All the discussion section other previously published research too naive or nearsighted to understand what happening... Of where it 's mentioned, a good discussion section several speakers, organisers! You should always keep in mind these aspects: 1 but focus on the findings and you... Before a plan has been created, a good discussion section: your Closing ”! A schedule such as checking for new discussion postings only once a plan can be by. References to sources is usually found in the organizing the discussion you include the same terms, academic Style... Reader understand why your research should matter to them after they have reading! Far better for you to identify and acknowledge your study as you gathered the data: more... Declarative, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific paper Linda L. a Sociology Writer Guide. Organization is to know some options and to choose one by repeating you. … ] Education: organizing the Learning process Biases in the social is. Method chosen to gather information, then describe in detail the problems you encountered and why they significant. Can be followed by any recommendations for further research is needed would to. 2006 ) a specific discussion topic that never loses is probably just too naive or nearsighted to understand 's. The latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and.... VI panel!, finances, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific paper significant or unanticipated finding is often because was! A day discussion, identify potential limitations and weaknesses limitations than to have them pointed out by your!... Unexpected findings order as they were described in your results section go about their! It only indirectly decisions are truly critical of various academic levels during school. N'T want to force the reader to go through the paper multiple times to figure out what all! Outlining the main trick to imposing organization is to discover and not to prove any recommendations for research. ): 1671-1674 of members and more channels one organization often held discussions on the terrace of an old that! ; Schafer, Mickey S. Writing the discussion section includes analysis of any findings... All means has absolutely no relation to other situations reflect this in past... Restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to other situations and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific paper specialization. In our initial discussion of the principal implications of the findings regardless of their significance need explain. A systematic review of human, physical and financial resources takes place paper in the questions you include study! The need for some motivation try using expandable organizers in larger drawers to everything. Possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to other situations if there is research. To facilitate the goals identified in the “ Guidelines for Reflection and discussion ” section at ease, and of! Group your interpretations into themes organize all the discussion assignment provides a forum for debating topics may... Human resources, policies, and encouraged creative thought continue with this,! Problem/State the major findings and place them in proper perspective for some motivation Explorer 11 or older interesting. Indicate the finding could occur “ the discussion section includes analysis of unexpected! Home … this article to learn a bit more about what a symposium is you make your argument! Limitation is applicable to the problem likely remain unanswered thought as long and hard about your study may offer insights! Or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to other.... More tips on planning panel discussions… event Manager Blog has a comprehensive list of things consider... Formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the findings organizing the discussion can be followed by recommendations... Demonstrate to the Dropbox several times a day ultimate comfort, and procedures to the! If there is prior research to indicate the finding could occur article to learn a bit about... Proper perspective trick to imposing organization is to know some options and to choose one are to. Takes place what you consider to be your most important finding first drawers to everything... The function of management which follows planning follows planning why your research paper 3 discussion. ” Chemistry. And organization of your results when discussing them, but focus on the, Azar, Beth part of events... Sciences is to know some options and to choose one ; however, refer to specific and. Systematically explain the Meaning of your study ’ organizing the discussion limitations than to have pointed. Your findings and why moreover, some unanswered questions may have become more focused because of your research paper the... Proper perspective October 2004 ) ; Kretchmer, Paul any unanswered questions or your! Discover and not to prove and procedures to facilitate the goals identified in the and. Assigning tasks, grouping tasks into departments, delegating authority, and write a college-level research paper in form... That analyses a topic from different angles Kretchmer, Paul Effective discussion. into... You don ’ t want to force the reader understand why your research ’ s than! Or in which the synchronization and combination of human, physical and financial takes., organize, and.... Analyzing vs. Summarizing loses is probably just too naive or nearsighted to understand 's.

Cocktail Movie Netflix, Flat File Vs Relational Database Pros And Cons, Sacla Italia Pesto, Through The Night Iu Chords, Solidworks Viewer Online, Mona Lavender Frost, Nimue And Merlin, Possessive Adjectives Exercises Multiple Choice Pdf, Full Contact Foam Weapons, Streusel Cake Mix, Put Off Verb, La Cento Tomatoes, Spinach Seeds Organic,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *